Sunday, May 9, 2010

More similarities than your fingers can hold

In Short Friday, by Isaac Bashevis Singer and Babette’s Feast, by Isak Dinesen, there are more similarities than just both these author’s names being Isaac/Isak. Both stories show the significance and impact food has had on them through a significant event. In Short Friday, Shmul-Leible and Shoshe honor their Sabbath “feast”, as they enjoy good food together while reading and singing prayers. However, in Babette’s Feast, Martine and Philippa grow compassionate towards Babette; by her artistry in cooking they become more grateful than ever. Through these similar but diverse stories we see the powerful effect food can have on literature’s characters.

Some similarities in both Short Friday and Babette’s Feast are that they deal with religiously devout characters. Shmul-Leible, Shoshe, Martine, and Philippa may be of a different religion, yet they all practice their faith earnestly. Both stories also talk of the afterlife; obviously being religious they believe in a life to come after we die with Paradise or “Heaven” being called out precisely. In Short Friday, an Angel comes and takes both Shoshe and her husband to Paradise when in Babette’s Feast Philippa embraces Babette and tells her that her art is never a loss, because in Paradise she will be all God wants her to be. Also, we see affection and sexuality, though Babette’s feast only tells of a kiss, yet it only takes a kiss to start something. However, both daughters run from any affection that could one day be marital to continue the sect and legacy their father had started. Nevertheless, Shoshe gives in to her husbands “new tricks” of affection, though it crosses the line of what is allowed in their Jewish religion. Another very interestingly similarity is that Shmul-Leible and Lorens Loewenhielm both had a case of home-sickness. Shmul-Leible lived a short home-sickness because we would anticipate finally going home and seeing his beautiful wife; telling her how great her food is. On the other hand, Lorens Loewenhielm was not from Norway, where it was Martine’s actual home city, but with her beauty and him falling in such love with her, it in a sense became his home because he would continuously visit her house. Yet, this “home” he had created made him feel so small and worthless at the same time because he never had the guts to tell her of his feelings but years later he returns and tells Martine that he has never forgotten her and never will. Both these men are looked upon as more manly through their “homesickness” because they always remember their “home”. Yet, through all these similarities, I think the most obvious is how these characters express their deep love for those around them. Shoshe cooks the most delightful food she can afford for her noble husband and Babette uses all her lottery money for Martine, Philippa and other guest’s feast to not only be of use in her creativeness, but also to show her great love for Martine and Philippa.

Though I explained few differences, it is simple to see that all their appetites whether it is sexual, creative, or actual hunger are explained through food. Both authors use food, paradise, religion, sexuality, and much more to get their point across. The point that came across to me is that food is extremely important and when joined with many other things they have a significant impact which could one day lead you to Paradise.

1 comment:

  1. wow! baby ruth. You've got good explanations and points here. Many similar to what I've thought but in your own unique way. The points like mentioning of afterlife in both texts, homesickness, about their religion, all are good. Good start.

    ReplyDelete